How to Read Plato

Here are some basic principles for interpreting Socratic dialogues.

(Intended for new readers of Plato, perhaps useful to experienced readers too.)

1. Every dialogue is an apologia for Socrates.

Plato used the dialogues to illustrate the exceptional virtues of his teacher, and the flaws of Socrates’ critics.

If you don’t think Socrates comes off well, you are reading it wrong.

2. Character is integral to worldview.

Socrates’ interlocutors’ views are always reflected in their character.

To understood the argument, it helps to recognize the distinctive character traits — especially vices — of Socrates’ interlocutors.

3. Dialogues have a dramatic arc along with an argumentative structure.

A dialogue isn’t an essay. Don’t try to isolate a theory or argument separable from the development of the conversation. Look for ways that the ideas are embodied in the interaction of the characters.

4. Every dialogue is a test of your character.

The dialogues are challenging. Being frustrated is okay; blaming the dialogue is not. (The shortcoming is in you!)

Your interpretation reflects your own character.

If you don’t see how the dialogue teaches, work harder.

In sum: Plato knew what he was doing writing dialogues. Take the form seriously.

If you read with these principles in mind, I can’t promise that all becomes clear, but your reading will be more profitable:

more insightful,

more enjoyable,

more personally enriching.

[Published originally as a thread on Twitter 9/6/2019, and subsequently on Medium, 9/8/2019]